From: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix os-term usage on kernel panic
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:15:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196208960.11297.26.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071120012815.GB7969@austin.ibm.com>
(resending with the proper "from" addr this time).
I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
patch. A "/sbin/reboot" is now behaving much more like a
"/sbin/halt".
Anybody else seeing this, or is it time for me to call an exorcist for
my boxes?
-Will
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 19:28 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> The rtas_os_term() routine was being called at the wrong time.
> The actual rtas call "os-term" will not ever return, and so
> calling it from the panic notifier is too early. Instead,
> call it from the machine_reset() call.
>
> The patch splits the rtas_os_term() routine into two: one
> part to capture the kernel panic message, invoked during
> the panic notifier, and another part that is invoked during
> machine_reset().
>
> Prior to this patch, the os-term call was never being made,
> because panic_timeout was always non-zero. Calling os-term
> helps keep the hypervisor happy! We have to keep the hypervisor
> happy to avoid service, dump and error reporting problems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
>
> ----
> One could make a strong argument to move all of this code
> from kernel/rtas.c to platforms/pseries/setup.c I did not
> do this, just so as to make the changes minimal.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 12 ++++++------
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 3 ++-
> include/asm-powerpc/rtas.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c 2007-11-19 18:58:53.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c 2007-11-19 19:01:10.000000000 -0600
> @@ -631,18 +631,18 @@ void rtas_halt(void)
> /* Must be in the RMO region, so we place it here */
> static char rtas_os_term_buf[2048];
>
> -void rtas_os_term(char *str)
> +void rtas_panic_msg(char *str)
> {
> - int status;
> + snprintf(rtas_os_term_buf, 2048, "OS panic: %s", str);
> +}
>
> - if (panic_timeout)
> - return;
> +void rtas_os_term(void)
> +{
> + int status;
>
> if (RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE == rtas_token("ibm,os-term"))
> return;
>
> - snprintf(rtas_os_term_buf, 2048, "OS panic: %s", str);
> -
> do {
> status = rtas_call(rtas_token("ibm,os-term"), 1, 1, NULL,
> __pa(rtas_os_term_buf));
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c 2007-11-19 18:58:53.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c 2007-11-19 19:01:10.000000000 -0600
> @@ -507,7 +507,8 @@ define_machine(pseries) {
> .restart = rtas_restart,
> .power_off = pSeries_power_off,
> .halt = rtas_halt,
> - .panic = rtas_os_term,
> + .panic = rtas_panic_msg,
> + .machine_shutdown = rtas_os_term,
> .get_boot_time = rtas_get_boot_time,
> .get_rtc_time = rtas_get_rtc_time,
> .set_rtc_time = rtas_set_rtc_time,
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4/include/asm-powerpc/rtas.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4.orig/include/asm-powerpc/rtas.h 2007-11-19 18:58:53.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2-git4/include/asm-powerpc/rtas.h 2007-11-19 19:01:10.000000000 -0600
> @@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ extern int rtas_call(int token, int, int
> extern void rtas_restart(char *cmd);
> extern void rtas_power_off(void);
> extern void rtas_halt(void);
> -extern void rtas_os_term(char *str);
> +extern void rtas_panic_msg(char *str);
> +extern void rtas_os_term(void);
> extern int rtas_get_sensor(int sensor, int index, int *state);
> extern int rtas_get_power_level(int powerdomain, int *level);
> extern int rtas_set_power_level(int powerdomain, int level, int *setlevel);
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-28 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-20 1:28 [PATCH] powerpc: fix os-term usage on kernel panic Linas Vepstas
2007-11-28 0:15 ` Will Schmidt [this message]
2007-11-28 11:00 ` Olaf Hering
2007-11-28 20:09 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-11-29 10:41 ` Olaf Hering
2007-12-03 19:32 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-11-28 20:18 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-11-29 17:19 ` Will Schmidt
2007-11-30 5:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-11-30 16:11 ` Will Schmidt
2007-11-30 19:26 ` Mike Strosaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1196208960.11297.26.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).