From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1B6DDE24 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 10:38:04 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add a device_initcall to machdep_calls From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Grant Likely In-Reply-To: References: <20071130225043.12499.86364.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <1196463486.13230.116.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:32:35 +1100 Message-Id: <1196465556.13230.120.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: olof@lixom.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Is that level of sophistication really warranted for this scenario? It's not -that- sophisticated and I want to have access to all init levels, not just device and I don't like adding ad-hoc ppc_md. calls that much. Ben.