linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, olof@lixom.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [POWERPC] Use new machine_xxx_initcall hooks in platform code
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:31:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196800273.13230.333.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712042036.00785.arnd@arndb.de>


On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 20:35 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> 1. If another platform gets added that uses the same firmware feature,
> it
> will automatically do the right thing.

Yes but is it something that we want to happen ? That is, do we want
code somewhere in a platform/foo dir to run when using platform/bar
because they happen to share a feature ?

I don't think so ... such code should be located elsewhere, maybe in
sysdev, where it's clear that it's shared.

Thus, thing that is -really- platform specific and wants to stay in the
platform code should move to the new mechanism I believe.

As for PS3, will there ever be another platform using LV1 ? If that is
the case, we may want to create a shared directory with all the LV1
bits...

> 2. The call to firmware_has_feature() turns into a compile-time check
> in
> many cases, so if the kernel does not contain support for any firmware
> with the given feature, all the code referenced it can get optimized
> away by the compiler.

The machine init stuff will soon get rid of whatever test is in it too,
as soon as I get to do the ELF magic.

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-04 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-02  6:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] [POWERPC] Add machine initcall macros Grant Likely
2007-12-02  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] [POWERPC] Use new machine_xxx_initcall hooks in platform code Grant Likely
2007-12-02  6:17   ` Grant Likely
2007-12-02 19:15   ` Olof Johansson
2007-12-04 12:23   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-12-04 13:36     ` Grant Likely
2007-12-04 13:43       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-12-04 20:59         ` Geoff Levand
2007-12-04 14:21       ` Grant Likely
2007-12-04 19:35         ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-12-04 20:31           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-12-04 21:52             ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-12-04 22:05             ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1196800273.13230.333.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).