From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848A5DDDF7 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:28:15 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] [POWERPC] pci_controller->arch_data really is a struct device_node * From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: <20071207020542.577bbfe8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20071206180045.0eb1db98.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20071207020542.577bbfe8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:27:51 +1100 Message-Id: <1197185271.6572.41.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: ppc-dev Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 02:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- Ah excellent, I had that on my to-do list for some time. However, we should also rename it as I'm getting more and more pressure to put a real void * arch_data in here for use by a specific PCI host bridge implementation... Cheers, Ben.