From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C57DDDF9 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:29:58 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Powerpc PCI cleanups (mainly iSeries) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <20071206094448.4de7967a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20071206180045.0eb1db98.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20071207020726.8c0ea12b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20071206094448.4de7967a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:29:26 +1100 Message-Id: <1197185366.6572.43.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , ppc-dev Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 09:44 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 02:07:26 +1100 > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:00:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > I started out looking for ways to remove our dependencies on pci_dn and > > > got sidetracked into clening up the iSeries PCI code. The intention of > > > the following set of patches is that there be no semantic changes > > > (mostly). > > > > Some of these will clearly conflict with Benh's PCI work. We will sot > > that out between us. :-) > > In the meantime... > > My tree is going to carry BenH's patches since they're obviously > important to 4xx. If these conflicts get sorted out soon, that would > be good :). At some point I'm going to start sending stuff to Paul. The PCI merge serie of my patches shoudn't go through your tree (it's a separate serie from my 4xx stuff and isn't quite ready just yet...). I'll sync with Stephen. Cheers, Ben.