From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B124DDFBB for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:37:44 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] [POWERPC] pci32: 4xx embedded platforms want to reassign all PCI resources From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <20071213151138.02db0cd8@weaponx> References: <20071213073851.C321FDDFC9@ozlabs.org> <20071213130113.59342c40@weaponx> <1197578243.15741.150.camel@pasglop> <20071213144056.1a46b7a3@weaponx> <1197579177.15741.169.camel@pasglop> <20071213151138.02db0cd8@weaponx> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:37:26 +1100 Message-Id: <1197581846.15741.183.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:11 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > Well, there is physical PCI hardware on the boards, yes. But what if > people have no intention of using it? E.g. they have no devices, etc. > Now we're requiring PCI support to be built into the kernel. > > I'm just being pedantic about keeping embedded tiny. Keeping your embedded design tiny (and thus your own BSP) is one thing, but adding ifdef's all over the place so that somebody can tinify an eval board, I'm less sure about this... but if you want, you can fixup my patches. Ben.