From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/: Spelling fixes From: David Woodhouse To: Joe Perches In-Reply-To: <5703e57f925f31fc0eb38873bd7f10fc44f99cb4.1197918891.git.joe@perches.com> References: <5703e57f925f31fc0eb38873bd7f10fc44f99cb4.1197918891.git.joe@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:15:52 -0500 Message-Id: <1197926152.3798.263.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Pavel Roskin , David Gibson , orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Yi Zhu , Jaroslav Kysela , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Peter De Shrijver , Rastapur Santosh , bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andy Gospodarek , "Amit S. Kale" , ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, atl1-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chris Snook , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , Jesse Brandeburg , Manish Lachwani , Jean Tourrilhes , Jeff Kirsher , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Francois Romieu , Daniel Drake , Li Yang , Jeff Garzik , Jeb Cramer , Chad Tindel , orinoco-users@lists.sourceforge.net, Jay Cliburn , Samuel Ortiz , Sivakumar Subramani , Jesse Huang , Mike Phillips , rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ulrich Kunitz , ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Alexander Indenbaum , Adam Fritzler , Auke Kok , James Ketrenos , Stefano Brivio , Haavard Skinnemoen , tulip-users@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ramkrishna Vepa , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Thomas , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, John Ronciak , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, Ron Mercer , Sreenivasa Honnur , Andrew Morton , Sorbica Shieh , Larry Finger List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:40 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cmd.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c | 4 ++-- I will apply these to the libertas tree; please remove them from any resend of this patch. If we were using git properly, it wouldn't matter -- I could just let the patch go in upstream and when it gets merged, it'll be fine. But for some reason we don't use git for network driver development; we pretend it's the 1990s and we deal with sets of patches instead. So having this simple change applied in an upstream tree would cause lots of pain, as far as I can tell. -- dwmw2