From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2949DDE3B for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 21:20:05 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibm_newemac: Increase number of default rx-/tx-buffers From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stefan Roese In-Reply-To: <1199526609-12290-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> References: <1199526609-12290-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:19:48 +1100 Message-Id: <1199528388.7291.55.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:50 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > Performance tests done by AMCC have shown that 256 buffer increase the > performance of the Linux EMAC driver. So let's update the default > values to match this setup. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese > --- Do we have the numbers ? Did they also measure latency ? Ben. > drivers/net/ibm_newemac/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/Kconfig > index 0d3e738..5a06727 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/net/ibm_newemac/Kconfig > @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ config IBM_NEW_EMAC > config IBM_NEW_EMAC_RXB > int "Number of receive buffers" > depends on IBM_NEW_EMAC > - default "128" > + default "256" > > config IBM_NEW_EMAC_TXB > int "Number of transmit buffers" > depends on IBM_NEW_EMAC > - default "64" > + default "256" > > config IBM_NEW_EMAC_POLL_WEIGHT > int "MAL NAPI polling weight"