From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3AB2C25B75 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=savoirfairelinux.com header.i=@savoirfairelinux.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=DFC430D2-D198-11EC-948E-34200CB392D2 header.b=dOdOJWcE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VrQy46XcNz3cnS for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 00:49:48 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=savoirfairelinux.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=savoirfairelinux.com header.i=@savoirfairelinux.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=DFC430D2-D198-11EC-948E-34200CB392D2 header.b=dOdOJWcE; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=savoirfairelinux.com (client-ip=208.88.110.44; helo=mail.savoirfairelinux.com; envelope-from=elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [208.88.110.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrQwN5PBxz3cVM for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 00:48:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.savoirfairelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E239C53DB; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id OWmkbaQti6vx; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.savoirfairelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328EF9C584C; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.savoirfairelinux.com 328EF9C584C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=savoirfairelinux.com; s=DFC430D2-D198-11EC-948E-34200CB392D2; t=1717166893; bh=4gJOT2TZM2vOr96kCkDrX091SaTjqssoW8NSELgeEzE=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=dOdOJWcEsLtRJnvmZHrd7joAl03hH1oLp9K4prLenwv82raBUOBImRW4hxEktPxXA EYyPIxUtmyJFKap11cje6hg71HRxQKTFEn+8oTyaqpLhSw6XWZxobCVOr3RKeAyNtn x6bfE1KhLhAnYzMWhEc/DwzKbfQ6CZQfBckFeP4mRXK/MV0SUpO+GcklsYZTOkb+Kj XL15epmwTYJ2exGvzlIFi0qyvm+CXfbfeb9JdK32vJSszSUNpgKPGzrW/RVr/BK9LU LjYSQyTy1TVR+0E/uNLt0Vox/0OiDrYus5FMBOIThFzilOQk0WOgkuVJgf6kRhLJTK 1VeDckfjArpdQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.savoirfairelinux.com Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7DO2Pw_eVkH3; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [192.168.48.237]) by mail.savoirfairelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B269C53DB; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Elinor Montmasson To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <1200863744.706237.1717166892907.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> In-Reply-To: <826f6c22-d1f1-42ce-a8d1-2d5cb894a970@sirena.org.uk> References: <20240515135411.343333-1-elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com> <20240515135411.343333-8-elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com> <822567441.349330.1715936735603.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> <1660761484.701255.1717159615755.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> <826f6c22-d1f1-42ce-a8d1-2d5cb894a970@sirena.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 7/9] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: add DT clock "cpu_sysclk" with generic codec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4581 (ZimbraWebClient - GC112 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4581) Thread-Topic: ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: add DT clock "cpu_sysclk" with generic codec Thread-Index: KvvrpDg7ywtOAT1UfAfWnw0nFmtERw== X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree , Conor Dooley , linuxppc-dev , alsa-devel , Xiubo Lee , Fabio Estevam , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , linux-sound , Jaroslav Kysela , Nicolin Chen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , shengjiu wang , linux-kernel Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: "Mark Brown" Sent: Friday, 31 May, 2024 15:05:28 > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:46:55AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote: >> From: "Mark Brown" >> > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:05:35AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote: >> >> From: "Mark Brown" >> >> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 03:54:09PM +0200, Elinor Montmasson wrote: > >> >> >> + struct clk *cpu_sysclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "cpu_sysclk"); >> >> >> + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_sysclk)) { >> >> >> + priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(cpu_sysclk); >> >> >> + priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX]; >> >> >> + clk_put(cpu_sysclk); >> >> >> + } > >> >> > I don't really understand the goal here - this is just reading whatever >> >> > frequency happens to be set in the hardware when the driver starts up >> >> > which if nothing else seems rather fragile? > >> >> The driver allow to set the sysclk frequency >> >> of the CPU DAI through `priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq` when calling >> >> `fsl_asoc_card_hw_params()`. >> >> Currently it is hard-coded per use-case in the driver. > >> >> My reasoning was that with a generic codec/compatible, there might >> >> be use-cases needing to use this parameter, so I exposed it here via DT. >> > >> >> Is it a bad idea to expose this parameter ? This is not a requirement for the >> >> driver to work, most of the current compatibles do not use this parameter. >> >> It is currently used only for `fsl,imx-audio-cs42888`. >> >> In that case I can remove this commit. > >> > I'm having a hard time connecting your reply here with my comment. This >> > isn't as far as I can see allowing the frequency to be explicitly >> > configured, it's just using whatever value happens to be programmed in >> > the clock when the driver starts. > >> In v3 I used parameters `cpu-sysclk-freq-rx/tx` to explicitly >> set the frequency. >> In its review Rob Herring said that the clock bindings should >> be used, so that's why I changed it to use this `cpu_sysclk` clock. > > So you're trying to use this as the audio clock? There's no code that > enables the clock which seems worrying, and I'd expect that if the > device is using it's own clock the device would be querying it directly > via the clock API rather than this. This all seems really confused. It's not specifically the audio clock, I am merely using this in the machine driver to let the user the possibility to configure the CPU DAI sysclock frequency. The CPU DAI and codec drivers already manage their own clocks. I agree it is confused, I am trying to expose a driver option for this generic compatible without really knowing a use case where it would be needed. With the S/PDIF it isn't needed, so I should probably remove this commit.