From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B89DDDEC for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:33:39 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] Add StorCenter DTS first draft. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Grant Likely In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:33:16 +1100 Message-Id: <1201048396.6807.52.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jon Loeliger Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > + > > + mpic: interrupt-controller@40000 { > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + #address-cells = <0>; > > Is #address-cells needed? There are no child nodes. It's preferrable for interrupt controllers as #address-cells of the parent interrupt controller defines the size of the interrupt unit specifier in the child in the interrupt tree. I think there's an ongoing argument as to whether the absence of #address-cells should be the same as #address-cells = 0 in that specific case but I'm not sure the code does the right thing so let's have it explicit. Ben.