From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462BBDDD0C for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:40:57 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PS3: gelic: gelic updates for 2.6.25 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20080122211239.GC3206@tuxdriver.com> References: <20071213181146.BF69.MOKUNO@sm.sony.co.jp> <20080122211239.GC3206@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:40:34 +1100 Message-Id: <1201048834.6807.55.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Geert.Uytterhoeven" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux/PPC Development Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 16:12 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:38:28PM +0900, Masakazu Mokuno wrote: > > > Here is a set of updates for PS3 gelic network driver. > > This patch set requires other patches which were already submitted by > > Geert (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119626095605487). > > > > [1] PS3: gelic: Fix the wrong dev_id passed > > [2] PS3: gelic: Add endianness macros > > [3] PS3: gelic: Code cleanup > > [4] PS3: gelic: Remove duplicated ethtool handers > > [5] PS3: gelic: Add support for port link status > > [6] PS3: gelic: Add support for dual network interface > > > > This is also a set of prerequisite for new wireless driver for PS3, which > > I'll submit later. > > These seem to not have been applied, but I couldn't find any stated > reason. Did they just get lost? Withdrawn? > > Will these be applied? There is a wireless patch that depends on them. > If not, will the wireless portion be refactored to not require these > patches? The list of 6 patches above are the patches that Masakazu Mukono is submitting, the pre-reqs are different patches (see the linked URL), though I can't see them in either (they should probably go through paulus for-2.6.25). Geert, what's up with these ? Cheers, Ben.