linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
@ 2008-01-23 22:37 Roel Kluin
  2008-01-23 23:05 ` Joe Perches
  2008-01-24  1:17 ` Josh Boyer
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Roel Kluin @ 2008-01-23 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jwboyer, lkml; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

logical/bitand typo

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
 	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
 	cs = 0;
 	while (val) {
-		if (val && 0x1)
+		if (val & 0x1)
 			cs++;
 		val = val >> 1;
 	}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-23 22:37 [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c Roel Kluin
@ 2008-01-23 23:05 ` Joe Perches
  2008-01-24  0:18   ` Roel Kluin
  2008-01-24  1:17 ` Josh Boyer
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2008-01-23 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roel Kluin, Andy Whitcroft; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 23:37 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
>  	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
>  	cs = 0;
>  	while (val) {
> -		if (val && 0x1)
> +		if (val & 0x1)
>  			cs++;
>  		val = val >> 1;

I think this pattern should be added to checkpatch

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 579f50f..147e573 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1337,6 +1337,11 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
+		if ($line =~ /\&\&\s*0[xX]/) {
+			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just 1 \&?\n" . $herecurr);
+		}
+
 # if and else should not have general statements after it
 		if ($line =~ /^.\s*(?:}\s*)?else\b(.*)/ &&
 		    $1 !~ /^\s*(?:\sif|{|\\|$)/) {

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-23 23:05 ` Joe Perches
@ 2008-01-24  0:18   ` Roel Kluin
  2008-01-24  0:39     ` Joe Perches
  2008-01-29 10:55     ` Andy Whitcroft
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Roel Kluin @ 2008-01-24  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 23:37 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
>>  	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
>>  	cs = 0;
>>  	while (val) {
>> -		if (val && 0x1)
>> +		if (val & 0x1)
>>  			cs++;
>>  		val = val >> 1;
> 
> I think this pattern should be added to checkpatch

I agree but...

> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 579f50f..147e573 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1337,6 +1337,11 @@ sub process {
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> +# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
> +		if ($line =~ /\&\&\s*0[xX]/) {
> +			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just 1 \&?\n" . $herecurr);
> +		}
> +

when you use git-grep -n "\(&&\|||\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)",
(with s="[[:space:]]*") there will be false positives like

if (relocation < -0x20000 || 0x1fffc < relocation)
if (ARCH_SUN4C_SUN4 && addr < 0xe0000000 && 0x20000000 - len < addr) {
(and more)

However, if you search with
git-grep -n " \(&&\|||\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)$s\()\|&&\|||\)"
you won't get these false positives, but you do get the one I fixed.

Also there is the same logic flipped (though it did not give matches at
this time):
git-grep -n " \(&&\|||\|(\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)$s\(&&\|||\)"

so i'd propose to change that to
--
Catch boolean tests with hexadecimals, based on suggestion by Joe Perches

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
---
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 579f50f..8ac7c7b 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1337,6 +1337,12 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
+		if ($line =~ /(?:(?:\(|\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:&&|\|\|)|
+				(?:\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:\)|&&|\|\|))/) {
+			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just 1 \& or \|?\n" . $herecurr);
+		}
+
 # if and else should not have general statements after it
 		if ($line =~ /^.\s*(?:}\s*)?else\b(.*)/ &&
 		    $1 !~ /^\s*(?:\sif|{|\\|$)/) {

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-24  0:18   ` Roel Kluin
@ 2008-01-24  0:39     ` Joe Perches
  2008-01-29 10:55     ` Andy Whitcroft
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2008-01-24  0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roel Kluin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 01:18 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> when you use git-grep -n "\(&&\|||\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)",
> (with s="[[:space:]]*") there will be false positives []
> so i'd propose to change that to
> +# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
> +		if ($line =~ /(?:(?:\(|\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:&&|\|\|)|
> +				(?:\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:\)|&&|\|\|))/) {
> +			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just 1 \& or \|?\n" . $herecurr);
> +		}
> +

All 13 false positives are "hex_constant logical_test variable".
I think that Linus would say that they are all poor style.

Still, fine by me.  cheers, Joe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-23 22:37 [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c Roel Kluin
  2008-01-23 23:05 ` Joe Perches
@ 2008-01-24  1:17 ` Josh Boyer
  2008-01-26 13:37   ` Stefan Roese
  2008-01-29 14:22   ` Valentine Barshak
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2008-01-24  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roel Kluin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, sr, lkml

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:37:33 +0100
Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> wrote:

> logical/bitand typo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
>  	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
>  	cs = 0;
>  	while (val) {
> -		if (val && 0x1)
> +		if (val & 0x1)
>  			cs++;
>  		val = val >> 1;
>  	}

Hm, good catch.

Stefan, have you had problems with this code at all?

josh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-24  1:17 ` Josh Boyer
@ 2008-01-26 13:37   ` Stefan Roese
  2008-01-29 14:22   ` Valentine Barshak
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-01-26 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Boyer; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Roel Kluin, lkml

On Thursday 24 January 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:37:33 +0100
>
> Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> > logical/bitand typo
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> > index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
> >  	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
> >  	cs = 0;
> >  	while (val) {
> > -		if (val && 0x1)
> > +		if (val & 0x1)
> >  			cs++;
> >  		val = val >> 1;
> >  	}
>
> Hm, good catch.
>
> Stefan, have you had problems with this code at all?

I'm not using the bootwrapper on a 4xx with Denali core.

Best regards,
Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-24  0:18   ` Roel Kluin
  2008-01-24  0:39     ` Joe Perches
@ 2008-01-29 10:55     ` Andy Whitcroft
  2008-01-29 13:34       ` Roel Kluin
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andy Whitcroft @ 2008-01-29 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roel Kluin; +Cc: Joe Perches, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:18:48AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 23:37 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> >> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> >> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
> >>  	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
> >>  	cs = 0;
> >>  	while (val) {
> >> -		if (val && 0x1)
> >> +		if (val & 0x1)
> >>  			cs++;
> >>  		val = val >> 1;
> > 
> > I think this pattern should be added to checkpatch
> 
> I agree but...
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index 579f50f..147e573 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -1337,6 +1337,11 @@ sub process {
> >  			}
> >  		}
> >  
> > +# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
> > +		if ($line =~ /\&\&\s*0[xX]/) {
> > +			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just 1 \&?\n" . $herecurr);
> > +		}
> > +
> 
> when you use git-grep -n "\(&&\|||\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)",
> (with s="[[:space:]]*") there will be false positives like
> 
> if (relocation < -0x20000 || 0x1fffc < relocation)
> if (ARCH_SUN4C_SUN4 && addr < 0xe0000000 && 0x20000000 - len < addr) {
> (and more)
> 
> However, if you search with
> git-grep -n " \(&&\|||\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)$s\()\|&&\|||\)"
> you won't get these false positives, but you do get the one I fixed.
> 
> Also there is the same logic flipped (though it did not give matches at
> this time):
> git-grep -n " \(&&\|||\|(\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)$s\(&&\|||\)"
> 
> so i'd propose to change that to
> --
> Catch boolean tests with hexadecimals, based on suggestion by Joe Perches
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 579f50f..8ac7c7b 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1337,6 +1337,12 @@ sub process {
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> +# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
> +		if ($line =~ /(?:(?:\(|\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:&&|\|\|)|
> +				(?:\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:\)|&&|\|\|))/) {
> +			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just 1 \& or \|?\n" . $herecurr);
> +		}
> +
>  # if and else should not have general statements after it
>  		if ($line =~ /^.\s*(?:}\s*)?else\b(.*)/ &&
>  		    $1 !~ /^\s*(?:\sif|{|\\|$)/) {

That one doesn't even match the original example.  Seems to be missing
some number matching.  The concept seems sound though.  Basically
looking for numbers which are definatly adjacent to a boolean or a brace
on both sides.

/me goes play with some examples to see if the falsies are better than
the reports.

-apw

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-29 10:55     ` Andy Whitcroft
@ 2008-01-29 13:34       ` Roel Kluin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Roel Kluin @ 2008-01-29 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Whitcroft; +Cc: Joe Perches, linuxppc-dev, lkml

>>> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 23:37 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>>>> -		if (val && 0x1)
>>>> +		if (val & 0x1)

>> Joe Perches wrote:
>>> I think this pattern should be added to checkpatch
>>> +		if ($line =~ /\&\&\s*0[xX]/) {

> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:18:48AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> I agree but there will be false positives, i'd propose to change that to
>> +		if ($line =~ /(?:(?:\(|\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:&&|\|\|)|
>> +				(?:\&\&|\|\|)\s*0[xX]\s*(?:\)|&&|\|\|))/) {

Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> That one doesn't even match the original example.  Seems to be missing
> some number matching.  The concept seems sound though.  Basically
> looking for numbers which are definatly adjacent to a boolean or a brace
> on both sides.

You are right. here's a version that does work. It works the same as
git-grep -E "((\(|&&|\|\|)[[:space:]]*(0[xX][0-9a-fA-F]+|[0-9]+)[[:space:]]*(&&|\|\|)|(&&|\|\|)[[:space:]]*(0[xX][0-9a-fA-F]+|[0-9]+)[[:space:]]*(\)|&&|\|\|))"

---
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 579f50f..62276f7 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1337,6 +1337,11 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
+		if ($line =~ /((\(|&&|\|\|)\s*(0[xX][0-9a-fA-F]+|[0-9]+)\s*(&&|\|\|)|(&&|\|\|)\s*(0[xX][0-9a-fA-F]+|[0-9]+)\s*(\)|&&|\|\|))/) {
+			WARN("boolean test with hexadecimal, perhaps just \'&\' or \'|\'?\n" . $herecurr);
+		}
+
 # if and else should not have general statements after it
 		if ($line =~ /^.\s*(?:}\s*)?else\b(.*)/ &&
 		    $1 !~ /^\s*(?:\sif|{|\\|$)/) {

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c
  2008-01-24  1:17 ` Josh Boyer
  2008-01-26 13:37   ` Stefan Roese
@ 2008-01-29 14:22   ` Valentine Barshak
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Valentine Barshak @ 2008-01-29 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Boyer; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, sr, Roel Kluin, lkml

Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:37:33 +0100
> Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> 
>> logical/bitand typo
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
>>  	val = DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_CS_MAP, DDR_CS_MAP_SHIFT);
>>  	cs = 0;
>>  	while (val) {
>> -		if (val && 0x1)
>> +		if (val & 0x1)
>>  			cs++;
>>  		val = val >> 1;
>>  	}
> 
> Hm, good catch.

Yes, thanks!

Sequoia and Rainier are currently the only boards using denali 
controller and have both chipselects enabled (val = 0x3).
In this case the problem doesn't show up and we still get the right cs 
value.
Thanks,
Valentine.

> 
> Stefan, have you had problems with this code at all?
> 
> josh
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-29 14:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-23 22:37 [PATCH][ppc] logical/bitand typo in powerpc/boot/4xx.c Roel Kluin
2008-01-23 23:05 ` Joe Perches
2008-01-24  0:18   ` Roel Kluin
2008-01-24  0:39     ` Joe Perches
2008-01-29 10:55     ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-01-29 13:34       ` Roel Kluin
2008-01-24  1:17 ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-26 13:37   ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-29 14:22   ` Valentine Barshak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).