From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christian Krafft <krafft@de.ibm.com>
Cc: parabelboi@bopserverein.de, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/2] powerpc: avoid userspace poking to legacy ioports
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:42:54 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1202935374.7296.44.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080213183506.7f3e3145@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 18:35 +0100, Christian Krafft wrote:
> sensors_detect crashes kernel on PowerPC, as it pokes directly to memory.
> This patch adds a check_legacy_ioports to read_port and write_port.
> It will now return ENXIO, instead of oopsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Krafft <krafft@de.ibm.com>
The problem is that this prevents using /proc/ioports to access PCI
IO space, which might be useful.
I hate that sensors_detect.. or for that matter any other userland code
that pokes random ports like that. It should die.
Ben.
> Index: linux.git/drivers/char/mem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.orig/drivers/char/mem.c
> +++ linux.git/drivers/char/mem.c
> @@ -566,8 +566,13 @@ static ssize_t read_port(struct file * f
> char __user *tmp = buf;
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> while (count-- > 0 && i < 65536) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MERGE
> + if (check_legacy_ioport(i))
> + return -ENXIO;
> +#endif
> if (__put_user(inb(i),tmp) < 0)
> return -EFAULT;
> i++;
> @@ -585,6 +590,7 @@ static ssize_t write_port(struct file *
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ,buf,count))
> return -EFAULT;
> +
> while (count-- > 0 && i < 65536) {
> char c;
> if (__get_user(c, tmp)) {
> @@ -592,6 +598,10 @@ static ssize_t write_port(struct file *
> break;
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MERGE
> + if (check_legacy_ioport(i))
> + return -ENXIO;
> +#endif
> outb(c,i);
> i++;
> tmp++;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-13 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 17:28 [Patch 0/2] add check_legacy_ioport calls to prevent oops Christian Krafft
2008-02-13 17:35 ` [Patch 0/2] powerpc: avoid userspace poking to legacy ioports Christian Krafft
2008-02-13 20:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-02-13 23:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-18 20:15 ` Jean Delvare
2008-02-18 20:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-18 20:58 ` Jean Delvare
2008-02-18 21:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 21:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-13 17:37 ` [Patch 2/2] powerpc: i2c-isa: add access check " Christian Krafft
2008-02-18 13:31 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1202935374.7296.44.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=krafft@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=parabelboi@bopserverein.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).