linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Becky Bruce <bgill@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prom.c: Fix dt_mem_next_cell() to read the full mem cells
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:45:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203162314.22915.46.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802151215210.1840@monty.am.freescale.net>


On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:17 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote:
> dt_mem_next_cell() currently does of_read_ulong().  This does
> not allow for the case where #size-cells and/or #address-cells = 2 on
> a 32-bit system, as it will end up reading 32 bits instead of the
> expected 64. Change it to use of_read_number instead and always return
> a u64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <becky.bruce at freescale.com>

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c |   13 +++++++------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index c17a585..ff600ef 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -865,12 +865,12 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_root(unsigned long node,
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long __init dt_mem_next_cell(int s, cell_t **cellp)
> +static u64 __init dt_mem_next_cell(int s, cell_t **cellp)
>  {
>  	cell_t *p = *cellp;
>  
>  	*cellp = p + s;
> -	return of_read_ulong(p, s);
> +	return of_read_number(p, s);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
> @@ -883,8 +883,8 @@ static unsigned long __init dt_mem_next_cell(int s, cell_t **cellp)
>  static int __init early_init_dt_scan_drconf_memory(unsigned long node)
>  {
>  	cell_t *dm, *ls;
> -	unsigned long l, n;
> -	unsigned long base, size, lmb_size, flags;
> +	unsigned long l, n, flags;
> +	u64 base, size, lmb_size;
>  
>  	ls = (cell_t *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,lmb-size", &l);
>  	if (ls == NULL || l < dt_root_size_cells * sizeof(cell_t))
> @@ -959,14 +959,15 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long node,
>  	    uname, l, reg[0], reg[1], reg[2], reg[3]);
>  
>  	while ((endp - reg) >= (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells)) {
> -		unsigned long base, size;
> +		u64 base, size;
>  
>  		base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &reg);
>  		size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, &reg);
>  
>  		if (size == 0)
>  			continue;
> -		DBG(" - %lx ,  %lx\n", base, size);
> +		DBG(" - %llx ,  %llx\n", (unsigned long long)base,
> +		    (unsigned long long)size);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>  		if (iommu_is_off) {
>  			if (base >= 0x80000000ul)

      reply	other threads:[~2008-02-16 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-15 18:17 [PATCH] prom.c: Fix dt_mem_next_cell() to read the full mem cells Becky Bruce
2008-02-16 11:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203162314.22915.46.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bgill@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).