From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053A5DDEC6 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:33:33 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Bamboo PCI interrupt issues From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stefan Roese In-Reply-To: <200803040715.22301.sr@denx.de> References: <1204588953.7921.13.camel@basalt> <20080303213718.12291eee@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <200803040715.22301.sr@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:33:04 +1100 Message-Id: <1204612384.21545.50.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: kvm-ppc-devel , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hollis Blanchard Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 07:15 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Using '8' is correct. PCI interrupts are *always* level sensitive and > active > low. Unless you use one of those strange bridges that stick not gates on the PCI IRQ inputs :-) But I don't think that's the case on the 440EP. Ben.