From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302B1DE060 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 03:37:40 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc From: David Woodhouse To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <15d7ac5a7542b05fb9b9abb5d4c7a22d@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1166053317.909.19.camel@praia> <20061214195842.GA14041@athena.road.mcmartin.ca> <1166362145.6714.53.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <6a89f9d50802060639j4b3a8b7u4e4e596b010ee353@mail.gmail.com> <15d7ac5a7542b05fb9b9abb5d4c7a22d@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:37:28 +0000 Message-Id: <1204648648.3891.439.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: paulus@samba.org, henrik.sorensen@gmail.com, Stephane Marchesin , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 22:53 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Can you elucidate? > Is there any reason to do this in assembler code at all? Is there any particular reason not to? -- dwmw2