From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (igw2.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailgw2.br.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B6DDE21D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:36:57 +1100 (EST) Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE5F17F4E3 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:28:46 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2AJaimk3870768 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:36:48 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2AJagKT001752 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:36:42 -0300 Subject: Re: PPC upstream kernel ignored DABR bug From: Luis Machado To: Roland McGrath In-Reply-To: <20080310191957.0B42626F991@magilla.localdomain> References: <20071126220224.GA5606@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200711290113.29024.arnd@arndb.de> <1205110432.10078.5.camel@gargoyle> <200803101501.34439.jens@de.ibm.com> <20080310191957.0B42626F991@magilla.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:36:37 -0300 Message-Id: <1205177797.23926.21.camel@gargoyle.br.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Paul Mackerras , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 12:19 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > On the Blade DABRX had to be set additional to DABR. PS3 and Celleb > > already did this. Uli Weigand found this back in November. I submitted > > a patch for this which went into 2.6.25-rc4. > > Can you please try again with rc4 ? > > This is not the problem. This came up before and everyone seems have > forgotten. This bug has been reproduced on G5's, which do not have DABRX > as I understand it. Yes, now that you mentioned, i've been able to reproduce this on 970FX's blades, which i don't think have DABRX registers. I guess it's the almost the same CPU as G5's. Regards, -- Luis Machado Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center