From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pasemi_dma: Driver for PA Semi PWRficient on-chip DMA engine From: Dan Williams To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: <20080306233900.GA3969@lixom.net> <20080311000619.ba39311f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080311142545.GA18843@lixom.net> <20080311105355.64a9c380.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1205259311.26723.40.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:37:20 -0700 Message-Id: <1205267840.27495.9.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: hskinnemoen@atmel.com, "Nelson, Shannon" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pasemi-linux@ozlabs.org, Olof Johansson , Andrew Morton List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 11:29 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote: > > My fault for not pushing out this cleanup to the old url while the > > git-md-accel changeover was pending. > > Any reason not to push Zhang's fixes for 2.6.25? I plan to push these fixes for 2.6.25. Olof had some valid comments about "Fix fsldma.c warning messages..." [1]. > I also have a patch I want to push for 2.6.25 to deal with the powerpc > device tree. I was going to handle this via the powerpc tree's since > that seems to be the model we have used for netdev and other drivers > that play with arch/powerpc. I hope that's not an issue (I'll CC you > on the patch). Not an issue at all. Just give me a heads up on what you want me to pick up and what you want me to just ack. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120524510630957&w=2