From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ares.ids.de (ares.ids.de [213.144.29.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA60DDF7C for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:31:56 +1100 (EST) Received: from ares.ids.de (ares.ids.de [127.0.0.1]) by ares.ids.de (PGP Universal) with ESMTP id 57942F491BF for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:31:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm_uart: Allocate DPRAM memory for SMC ports onCPM2-based platforms. From: Sergej Stepanov To: Laurent Pinchart In-Reply-To: <200803251732.32569.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> References: <20080325160331.GB15093@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <200803251720.24667.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <200803251732.32569.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:31:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1206520313.26613.14.camel@p60365-ste> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am Dienstag, den 25.03.2008, 17:32 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > Do you have any opinion about the proposed patch ? > I have to say, it could be some off-topic. But if you would use the cpm_uart-driver for cpm2(or cpm1) as kernel module, at linking you can get warnings about: - cpm_setbrg (cpm_set_brg): something with section mismatch - __alloc_bootmem (cpm_uart_allocbuf): the same The symbols are not exported. Is it ok, about kernel modules? Sergej.