Re: printk time confusion?

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org>]

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 16:23 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Not sure whether the lockdep patches or something else is causing this
> as I haven't checked w/o the patches yet, but I seem to be having some
> confusion of printk timestamps:

Tried reverting the patches ?

> [...]
> [  176.440255] iwl4965: No space for Tx
> [...]
> [  147.983705] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6361): Unknown cmd fd(25) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/2
> [...]
> [  173.589209] BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison overwritten
> [...]
> [  208.385226] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6498): Unknown cmd fd(29) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/6
> [...]
> [  139.026724] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6521): Unknown cmd fd(30) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe8) on /dev/pts/7
> [...]
> [  155.982345] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6543): Unknown cmd fd(31) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/8
> [...]
> [  218.918388] tg3: eth0: Link is down.
> [...]
> 
> Yes, these entries really were printed in that order. Btw, what's with
> the unknown ioctls?

Proably ioctl's that lack a 32 bits conversion, you'll have to dig in
the pty stuff to find out which ones it is and if it can be a problem...

> Kernel version is 2.6.25-rc8-wl-04519-g6648ff7-dirty where -wl/-dirty
> refers to wireless patches and the lockdep patches and otherwise it's
> just -rc8.
> 
> johannes