From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69E9DE195 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:47:15 +1000 (EST) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z59so1042927pyg.27 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ibm_newemac: PowerPC 440GX EMAC PHY clock workaround From: Josh Boyer To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <48011B70.1020102@garzik.org> References: <20080327144044.GA8831@ru.mvista.com> <47EDA6F1.9080206@garzik.org> <20080411092417.57825115@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <48011B70.1020102@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:47:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1208033230.5869.18.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: Josh Boyer Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 16:28 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:18:25 -0400 > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >> Valentine Barshak wrote: > >>> The PowerPC 440GX Taishan board fails to reset EMAC3 (reset timeout error) > >>> if there's no link. Because of that it fails to find PHY chip. The older ibm_emac > >>> driver had a workaround for that: the EMAC_CLK_INTERNAL/EMAC_CLK_EXTERNAL macros, > >>> which toggle the Ethernet Clock Select bit in the SDR0_MFR register. This patch > >>> does the same for "ibm,emac-440gx" compatible chips. The workaround forces > >>> clock on -all- EMACs, so we select clock under global emac_phy_map_lock. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak > >>> --- > >>> drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > >>> drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.h | 8 ++++++-- > >>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> is this for 2.6.25-rc? > > > > Jeff, can I get an ack from you on this patch, and patch 2 in this > > set? They depend on a patch in my tree and I'd like to include them in > > my next push to Paul for 2.6.26. > > ACK Many thanks. > I had queried the status of these patches, and didn't receive any reply > initially from my query... Erm... you did. http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-March/053737.html No worries though. I lose email all the time. josh