From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42126DE617 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:18:28 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] Fix kernel stack allocation alignment From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20080418000618.0c46c78f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080418065727.5FE1CDE247@ozlabs.org> <20080418000618.0c46c78f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:18:18 +1000 Message-Id: <1208506698.6958.400.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Linux-Arch , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > so... the "0" defeats all of SLAB_DEBUG_FREE, SLAB_RED_ZONE, SLAB_POISON > and SLAB_STORE_USER, if the comment in slab.h is to be believed. > > Was that overkill? Well, I copied over from something else, looks like there's a -lot- of 0 users here... Shouldn't there be some kind of SLAB_DEFAULT that contain those things ? Ben.