From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26?] Raise the upper limit of NR_CPUS. From: Michael Ellerman To: Tony Breeds In-Reply-To: <20080418053349.GE20457@bakeyournoodle.com> References: <20080418053349.GE20457@bakeyournoodle.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-asBtM8HVq9oVBJyGUBbD" Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:33:44 +1000 Message-Id: <1208514829.8424.0.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: LinuxPPC-dev , Paul Mackerras Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-asBtM8HVq9oVBJyGUBbD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:33 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > As the pacas are statically initialised increasing NR_CPUS beyond 128, > means that any additional pacas will be empty ... which is bad. >=20 > This patch adds the required functionality to fill in any excess pacas > at runtime. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds > --- > I know it's late, but can this be considered for 2.6.26? >=20 > arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c | 33 ++++++++++----------------= -- > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++ > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 4 +- > include/asm-powerpc/paca.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++ What happens on non prom-init platforms? cheers --=20 Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person --=-asBtM8HVq9oVBJyGUBbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBICHkIdSjSd0sB4dIRAsDfAJ9wunbIAfdlMkLXc55XSssbzCWdwACbBSdL WAVjlqPzHI6I4Df355ZiYR8= =ZcuM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-asBtM8HVq9oVBJyGUBbD--