From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407F3DE517 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:53:41 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC][WIP][PATCH] Add IRQSTACKS to ppc32 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <43F83C6F-D84B-4626-8974-9BCEDF03194E@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1209021537.9060.156.camel@pasglop> <43F83C6F-D84B-4626-8974-9BCEDF03194E@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:53:33 +1000 Message-Id: <1209048813.9060.192.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 07:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > I'm going to change it to be just lmb_alloc() so it will be difficult > to share with ppc64 (other than w/an ifdef). Unless we change lmb_alloc to just be an lmb_alloc_base with 0 and have the later do the right thing ? You don't put highmem in the LMBs ? If you do, we do need to have the max lowmem there no ? Ben.