From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ares.ids.de (ares.ids.de [213.144.29.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C5CDE5E1 for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 05:40:40 +1000 (EST) Received: from ares.ids.de (ares.ids.de [127.0.0.1]) by ares.ids.de (PGP Universal) with ESMTP id 68963F490A4 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 21:40:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: powerpc port for sbc8260-based board problem From: Sergej Stepanov To: Scott Wood In-Reply-To: <48220428.6020207@freescale.com> References: <733382.15174.qm@web50603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20080507182209.GA2710@loki.buserror.net> <1210185652.3519.18.camel@p60365-ste> <4821FBA0.9080203@freescale.com> <1210188413.3519.36.camel@p60365-ste> <48220428.6020207@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 21:40:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1210189239.6362.3.camel@p60365-ste> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2008, 14:34 -0500 schrieb Scott Wood: > Sergej Stepanov wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2008, 13:57 -0500 schrieb Scott Wood: > >> I'm not sure how it would make a difference -- the BRG should have > >> already been set through the set_termios callback, which is called from > >> uart_set_options. > >> > >> -Scott > > Yes, i thought it also, but i traced it for us for the uart console. > > The cpm_uart_set_termios(..) was not called. > > At which place should it be called? > > Is it uart_set_options(..)? > > Yes, uart_set_options() calls port->ops->set_termios(). > > -Scott Hm... it looks like the default uart_set_termios from static const struct tty_operations uart_ops in serial_core.c and not cpm_uart_set_termios(..)?.. Is not it? but why?... Ok, i have to look at my code again... Regards.