From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD69CDDE21 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:37:53 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [Bug 10714] Badness seen on 2.6.26-rc2 with lockdep enabled From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Adrian Bunk In-Reply-To: <20080614230424.GA21168@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080614230424.GA21168@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:29:21 +1000 Message-Id: <1213486161.8129.89.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Balbir Singh Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 02:04 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10714 > > Subject : Badness seen on 2.6.26-rc2 with lockdep enabled > > Submitter : Balbir Singh > > Date : 2008-05-14 12:57 (32 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121076917429133&w=4 > > Benjamin, you said you wanted to have a look at this? Ah yes, slipped out of my mind. It's probably a missing annotation in the RTAS code, I'll have a look tomorrow. Thanks, Ben.