From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C81DE09F for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:48:57 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: James Bottomley In-Reply-To: <1215468479.3274.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080707222528.280f0b9e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1215441589.3274.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1215468350.8970.129.camel@pasglop> <1215468479.3274.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:48:42 +1000 Message-Id: <1215470922.8970.150.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-scsi , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:07 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I thought it was all done and dusted (which is why I put it in > scsi-misc). However, now Brian King seems to have some late arriving > comments. There are comments on the whole serie yup, I haven't put it in the tree yet. Cheers, Ben.