From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A84ADDF1B for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:18:44 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <20080725190838.27c227bc@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <1211391577.6232.15.camel@gargoyle> <18484.60888.981390.893747@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1213992894.6635.41.camel@gargoyle> <20080719093752.5aada45c@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1216658194.5727.36.camel@gargoyle> <20080721130551.23a06006@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1216777678.5727.82.camel@gargoyle> <20080723115321.53aa655b@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1216829442.5727.97.camel@gargoyle> <1216958433.11188.70.camel@pasglop> <83A1F423-1C8B-405D-9118-D9BB51A8AA94@kernel.crashing.org> <1217021937.11188.110.camel@pasglop> <20080725190838.27c227bc@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:18:24 +1000 Message-Id: <1217027904.11188.122.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: ppc-dev , Paul Mackerras , Christoph Hellwig Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 19:08 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:38:57 +1000 > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > Josh pointed out that you went ahead and merged this. Curse you :) > > > > > > I've got a patch in my tree to address my initial concerns. > > > > Well, I asked Josh on IRC and he was fine, I got your email too late. > > I was (and still am) OK with it. Kumar's comments are valid but not > major for 44x. Some cleanup could be done, but I was more focused on > getting it in during this merge window. > > I think we just had a small case of bad timing. I blame conferences > and late nights of beer^H^H^H^Hcoding. Yeah, as I said, the patch is fine (ie shouldn't break anything) and has had plenty of review so I felt it was good to go, we can do cleanups later. I wanted that feature in the merge window, next week would have been too late :-) Cheers, Ben.