From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e31.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9A2DE372 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:09:59 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6SK9tZq024761 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:09:55 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6SK9tXM176466 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:09:55 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6SK9sI3023158 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:09:55 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 V2] Align stack boundaries based on personality From: Dave Hansen To: Eric Munson In-Reply-To: <6061445882ce9574999bf343eeb333be02a1afa6.1216928613.git.ebmunson@us.ibm.com> References: <6061445882ce9574999bf343eeb333be02a1afa6.1216928613.git.ebmunson@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:09:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1217275793.23502.35.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:17 -0700, Eric Munson wrote: > > +static unsigned long personality_page_align(unsigned long addr) > +{ > + if (current->personality & HUGETLB_STACK) > +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP > + return HPAGE_ALIGN(addr); > +#else > + return addr & HPAGE_MASK; > +#endif > + > + return PAGE_ALIGN(addr); > +} ... > - stack_top = PAGE_ALIGN(stack_top); > + stack_top = personality_page_align(stack_top); Just out of curiosity, why doesn't the existing small-page case seem to care about the stack growing up/down? Why do you need to care in the large page case? -- Dave