From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] please pull cell merge branch From: Carl Love To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200808110918.57293.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1217620879.15667.145.camel@carll-linux-desktop> <200808091513.05251.arnd@arndb.de> <18591.30474.127939.243247@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200808110918.57293.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:34:44 -0700 Message-Id: <1218468884.6637.114.camel@carll-linux-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Robert Richter , linux-kernel , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, Paul Mackerras , cel , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 09:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 11 August 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > I've fixed one last bug in Carl's update for cell-oprofile (int flags > > > instead of unsigned long flags) and made sure the comments fit the > > > usual style. This fixes a long-standing bug that prevented us from > > > using oprofile on SPUs in many real-world scenarios. > > > > Since you're touching generic oprofile code here, do you have an ack > > from the oprofile maintainer? Or is the oprofile maintainer listed in > > MAINTAINERS (Robert Richter) no longer active or something? > > > > Sorry about that. I had assumed that at the very least Carl had had > the oprofile list on Cc and that people there just didn't care. > > Robert has just recently taken over maintainership for oprofile, > so I assume that he is indeed active and interested in the patches. > I'll send them out again for his review on oprofile-list. > > Arnd <>< Sorry, my mistake. I did mean to post both patches to the OProfile list as well. I was planning on following up with Robert on the patches this week since I had not heard from him. Carl Love