From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DD9DE973 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:55:54 +1000 (EST) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c34so236299anc.78 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] add a simple 405EP based board From: Josh Boyer To: Markus Brunner In-Reply-To: <200808211007.59965.super.firetwister@gmail.com> References: <200808211007.59965.super.firetwister@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:55:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1219319729.26429.40.camel@jdub.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: Josh Boyer Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 10:07 +0200, Markus Brunner wrote: > This adds support for a simple ppc405ep board. > At the moment, there are no 405ep boards in arch/powerpc, so this can be used as a template > for new boards, or migrating them from arch/ppc. > I2c, UART and EMAC are working. PCI could not be tested, so it was not included in the dts. I plan on adding more 405 board support very soon. When I do, it'll be along the lines of the patch series I just sent out for 44x. There's really no reason to have a per CPU/board file if we can avoid it. Your code is simple enough overall, so I might even use it as a starting point. If I do, I'll certainly give you credit. Though it's incomplete in that you have a DTS that requires something to poke values into it, and nothing readily apparent to do so. A cuImage wrapper is probably warranted here. josh