From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203A5C636CC for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4P5pkY2ZHKz3chB for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 02:24:37 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VN13NyIr; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=stefanb@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VN13NyIr; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P5pjV6Rcsz3bfT for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 02:23:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30VEf7Sd005558; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=sG7vtSwMwxwbzANbj/qnKds6cRUMyiu4k7TCsxvs5rg=; b=VN13NyIrVv4l3fyZSWIE78rMJpDLjcy7DafteLc2lBDbn4j7S/jgAE0S8aGP4QWC04oX ooF/PZbEbP1/gTpz79dBQDoKBI08xqirqm91Thv8AM82ZJ9FVo27AjDhmzbzGIPyYcDk LpeTVOfUCkmVTENVjITKP7DU0+jksuC6q5PWoGYbVlFnygltyw9pp+6bO8y7k4khNtal sgoL90nUp1orozAH+Q7Hfgagox8jVL2S7kAjXi5fY7cLVfBNK20yCeraPmAojA2lgQXd hvHQomT2By3NSaKxp/3mgIsD5F5+/+7hR0Ac/onZG1NGjoI9XHHntbjlRmicJkD9rYjf PQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nf31ncjb6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:36 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 30VFLIar022048; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:36 GMT Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nf31ncjak-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:36 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30VDU5Nw008155; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:34 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.130.100]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ncvw2mtsn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:34 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.230]) by smtprelay06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30VFNXCn6226558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:33 GMT Received: from smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C4458058; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FA05805C; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.47.158.152] (unknown [9.47.158.152]) by smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:23:31 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <121dbedc-dda7-e502-7f07-54532d7ca165@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:23:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/25] powerpc/secvar: Handle format string in the consumer Content-Language: en-US To: Andrew Donnellan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org References: <20230131063928.388035-1-ajd@linux.ibm.com> <20230131063928.388035-8-ajd@linux.ibm.com> From: Stefan Berger In-Reply-To: <20230131063928.388035-8-ajd@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UPvYePknW9MoQJkD_DRvhuHElir_9Msk X-Proofpoint-GUID: FbmyPvPkRWeYc83VLx3oadkzu9YX2YOD X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-31_08,2023-01-31_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=986 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301310135 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sudhakar@linux.ibm.com, erichte@linux.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nayna@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, gjoyce@linux.ibm.com, ruscur@russell.cc, joel@jms.id.au, bgray@linux.ibm.com, brking@linux.ibm.com, gcwilson@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 1/31/23 01:39, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > From: Russell Currey > > The code that handles the format string in secvar-sysfs.c is entirely > OPAL specific, so create a new "format" op in secvar_operations to make > the secvar code more generic. No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Russell Currey > Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger