From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B45BDDEDD for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 17:12:52 +1000 (EST) Subject: RE: [PATCH] ibm_newemac: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112PHY From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Victor Gallardo In-Reply-To: <0CA0A16855646F4FA96D25A158E299D602C8135D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References: <1220658734-13944-1-git-send-email-vgallardo@amcc.com> <1220833754.4879.228.camel@pasglop> <0CA0A16855646F4FA96D25A158E299D602C8135D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:12:40 +1000 Message-Id: <1220944360.4879.326.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Feng Kan , netdev@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 22:57 -0700, Victor Gallardo wrote: > Hello Benjamin, > > On the 460EX/GT in SGMII mode, GPCS access is needed for communication with the internal SGMII SerDes. It is possible that there is still a PHY. So we need a way to access both addresses. > > For Example on the AMCC Arches Board. > > EMAC 0 has only a GPCS PHY (address 0xA) > EMAC 1 has M88E1112 PHY (address 0x0) and GPCS PHY (address 0xB) > EMAC 2 has M88E1112 PHY (address 0x1) and GPCS PHY (address 0xC) Ok. Thanks. I need to review your patch a bit better, hopefully later this week. I'll let you know. Ping me if you get no news by next monday. Cheers, Ben. > Regards, > > Victor Gallardo > > ________________________________ > > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:benh@kernel.crashing.org] > Sent: Sun 9/7/2008 5:29 PM > To: Victor Gallardo > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Feng Kan > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibm_newemac: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112PHY > > > > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 16:52 -0700, Victor Gallardo wrote: > > From: Victor Gallardo > > > > This patch adds GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY support > > for the AMCC PPC460GT/EX processors. > > So if I understand the patch correctly, either there is an *MII PHY in > which case phy_address is used, or there's a GPCS one and phy_address is > -1 and gpcs_address is used right ? > > Why not instead always use phy_address, and have a flag indicating > whether it's an MII or GPCS PHY ? This would avoid the added > gpcs_read/write functions, among other things, and I believe would look > cleaner... Or am I missing something ? > > Cheers, > Ben. > > > >