linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] POWERPC: Merge 32 and 64-bit dma code
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:10:31 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220998231.14835.1.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080909204534.GA30975@lst.de>


> Yeah, the statement this time should be why do you keep _single :)
> It don't really mind which one we keep, but having both and both
> optional seems rather odd.

It would be more logic to implement _single on top of _page.. as long as
we can still do sub-page mappings (needed on ppc64) which I think we can
using the offset / size args of _page...

But that means more work changing the existing ppc64 backends :-) So
probably a worthwhile long term goal but what Becky did is ok for the
transition. I can look at fixing up the ppc64 ones to implement page
(and see if that causes any problem) some time after Plumbers conf.

Cheers,
Ben.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-09 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-08 19:09 [PATCH 0/4] POWERPC: 32/64-bit DMA code merge and cleanup Becky Bruce
2008-09-08 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c Becky Bruce
2008-09-08 19:09   ` [PATCH 2/4] POWERPC: Move iommu dma ops from dma.c to dma-iommu.c Becky Bruce
2008-09-08 19:09     ` [PATCH 3/4] POWERPC: Drop archdata numa_node Becky Bruce
2008-09-08 19:09       ` [PATCH 4/4] POWERPC: Merge 32 and 64-bit dma code Becky Bruce
2008-09-08 22:03         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-09 10:54           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-09 14:39           ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-09 20:45             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-09 22:10               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-09-09 22:13                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-09 22:17                   ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-12 20:34         ` [PATCH V2 " Becky Bruce
2008-10-13 14:49           ` Josh Boyer
2008-10-13 15:41             ` Josh Boyer
2008-10-13 18:06               ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-13 18:21                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-10-13 18:22                   ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-13 23:30                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-14  1:52                       ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-14 10:24                         ` Josh Boyer
2008-10-14 12:05                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-14 15:45                             ` Becky Bruce
2008-10-13 23:30                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-08 21:57     ` [PATCH 2/4] POWERPC: Move iommu dma ops from dma.c to dma-iommu.c Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-12 15:32       ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-08 19:18   ` [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c Scott Wood
2008-09-08 21:27     ` git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c) Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-08 21:38       ` git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch Scott Wood
2008-09-08 21:54         ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-09  0:55           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-09  9:06           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-08 21:58       ` git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c) Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-09  0:53       ` git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch Junio C Hamano
2008-09-09 10:06         ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-09 14:45           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-09 15:14             ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-10  3:31               ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-08 21:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] POWERPC: 32/64-bit DMA code merge and cleanup Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220998231.14835.1.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).