From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xes-mad.com (xes-mad.com [216.165.139.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9468DE007 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:07:11 +1000 (EST) Subject: Git branch conventions From: Nate Case To: Paul Mackerras Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:22:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1221164577.10636.390.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Paul, Can you (or anyone really) describe what the usage conventions are for the master, powerpc-next, and merge branches in your tree? The 'master' and 'powerpc-next' branches appear to be identical right now. I can see that you usually submit pull requests to Linus via your 'merge' branch. I also notice that there are changes in 'merge' that aren't in 'master' or 'powerpc-next'. Likewise, I see changes in 'powerpc-next'/'master' that aren't in 'merge'. Is 'powerpc-next'/'master' purely 2.6.28 material currently while 'merge' is for whatever the next target release is (currently 2.6.27)? I couldn't find this explained officially anywhere, so I thought I'd ask. Maybe it'd shed some light for other people too. -- Nate Case