From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA734DDF02 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:56:24 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Regarding select() on PPC From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200809230746.03234.arnd@arndb.de> References: <7B7EF7F090B9804A830ACC82F2CDE95D56E14C@insardxms01.ap.sony.com> <200809230746.03234.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:56:01 +1000 Message-Id: <1222149361.12085.101.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Sadashiiv, Halesh" , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 07:46 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I would definitely switch over the ppc32 __NR_newselect implementation > to sys_select. For __NR_select, there is no correct solution, the three > options are the current ppc_select, the real sys_select or sys_ni_syscall. > Each of these is broken in different ways, but in practice it will never > be called anyway. > > I love archeology. Any idea when glibc got fixed ? Ben