From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4200DE010 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:57:43 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: powerpc.git status From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <9B078573-0862-4176-A945-E273D78B260F@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1223357268.8157.38.camel@pasglop> <9B078573-0862-4176-A945-E273D78B260F@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:57:37 +1100 Message-Id: <1223405857.8157.55.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 07:29 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > While paul was away, I've been taking care of the tree, so currently > > up to date is my git at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git > > > > I've pushed a batch of stuff to the "master" branch. I haven't yet > > updated the "next" branch, I'm going to let master settle a day or two > > first just in case. > > > > I'll update patchwork status asap. > > Ben, remind me the difference between your 'master' and 'next' > branches? Will you rebase 'master'? Well, mostly they are the same, let's say that I'm trying to avoid rebasing both, but if shit happens, it's better if master gets rebased and not next though it's a bit arbitrary and Im not sure it's really useful in practice. Ben.