From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC187DE6BD for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 06:16:51 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: powerpc.git status From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <9F5B82DA-D13D-4997-A247-59EAD0483230@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1223357268.8157.38.camel@pasglop> <9B078573-0862-4176-A945-E273D78B260F@kernel.crashing.org> <1223405857.8157.55.camel@pasglop> <1351959C-EAEB-4C14-8A55-665F4C4C0601@kernel.crashing.org> <1223458152.8157.72.camel@pasglop> <9F5B82DA-D13D-4997-A247-59EAD0483230@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:16:45 +1100 Message-Id: <1223493405.8157.76.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 07:10 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:29 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > >> Its useful to not rebase a branch you expect people to send you > >> patches against and sub-maintainers are using to build tree's > >> against. It sounds like 'next' is that branch. > > > > Indeed. Though so far I've managed to avoid rebasing anything :-) > > So what's the status of the patches moving from master into next? Mostly "just in case". No big deal. I'll move them over today hopefully. Ben.