From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E823DDDF6F for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:46:54 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API From: David Woodhouse To: Paul Mundt In-Reply-To: <20081010093642.GA10579@linux-sh.org> References: <1223608819.8157.127.camel@pasglop> <48EED4D1.2040506@billgatliff.com> <20081010093642.GA10579@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:46:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1223632003.12547.65.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Bill Gatliff , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, Linux/PPC Development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:36 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > This is likely because some of those lists are subscribers only, so cross > posting is poor form. It makes sense to keep the discussion in one place, > and to send notification messages with a pointer to the list archives to > the other lists so folks can jump in if they really care. Splitting it > out doesn't help matters in the least, but unfortunately this is what > seems to happen the most when subscribers only lists are involved. Subscriber-only lists are broken. Just don't use them. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation