From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01D0DDF4A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:45:27 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API From: Jon Loeliger To: Bill Gatliff In-Reply-To: <48EF60F2.2050403@billgatliff.com> References: <1223608819.8157.127.camel@pasglop> <48EED4D1.2040506@billgatliff.com> <1223614943.8157.158.camel@pasglop> <9e4733910810092206r5ba516ddv3d3ec910634431f5@mail.gmail.com> <48EF60F2.2050403@billgatliff.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:45:14 -0500 Message-Id: <1223671514.4889.6.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:04 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Jon Smirl wrote: > > > What do the device tree deities have to say about PWM support? > > Dunno. What lists are they on? :) > Perhaps devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org too. jdl