linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nate Case <ncase@xes-inc.com>
To: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, ths@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enforce a non-spe kernel build even on broken compilers
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:25:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224012320.7879.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080901142302.GA13754@www.tglx.de>

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 16:23 +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> those two are requried on my fresh gcc 4.3.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thiemo Seufer <ths@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> Not sure if this is intendent or a gcc bug but with -mno-spe
> the spe opcodes were not used floating point anymore but
> for 64bit save/restore for instance.

I wouldn't say this is due to a broken compiler. As I understand it,
-mabi=no-spe and -mspe=no serve two different purposes.  One is for
disabling the SPE instructions and the other controls the ABI (which
would make those 64-bit save/restores I'm guessing).  I don't know why
you'd ever want to use the SPE ABI without -mspe=yes, but gcc does
provide that flexibility.

	-mno-spe: Deprecated way to say "no SPE instructions"
	-mspe=no: New way to do -mno-spe
	-mabi=no-spe: Disable SPE ABI

Some compilers may enable "-mabi=spe" and/or "-mspe=yes" by default, so
explicitly disabling both is necessary.  I recently built a SPE
toolchain which enabled both by default, so I ran into the "SPE used in
kernel" problem when the kernel only passed "-mno-spe".
	
- Nate Case <ncase@xes-inc.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-14 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-01 14:23 [PATCH] powerpc: enforce a non-spe kernel build even on broken compilers Sebastian Siewior
2008-10-14 19:25 ` Nate Case [this message]
2008-10-14 22:02   ` Nate Case
2008-10-14 21:23 ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-14 22:35   ` Nate Case
2008-10-14 22:49   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-15  8:59     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-15 13:25       ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-15 14:43         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-15 16:31           ` Kumar Gala
2008-10-17 14:02           ` Nate Case
2008-10-17 15:01             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-10-24 23:51             ` Nate Case
2008-10-24 23:55               ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1224012320.7879.79.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ncase@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ths@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).