From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172CDDDEEB for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:12:15 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Extended Addressing Mode From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <88C8EDEB-C9A5-4876-AF7D-55CBABBE111D@kernel.crashing.org> References: <48FEEB88.6050505@kontron.com> <83735324-C37B-4C57-A50F-FFF0D133E4E3@kernel.crashing.org> <48FF23C4.5030408@kontron.com> <88C8EDEB-C9A5-4876-AF7D-55CBABBE111D@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:11:46 +1100 Message-Id: <1224713506.7654.353.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9gis_Odey=E9?= Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 08:08 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > We are developing a board based on Freescale 8641D which can get > 4GB > > of ram. So I need 4GB+IOs (~1GB) of physical addressing space. > > My plan is to put a part of this ram above of 4GB to keep accesses > > to the IOs below the 4GB limit. It means non-contiguous ram > > addressing and XAEN features to be working. Why would you put the IOs below the 4G point ? It's actually easier to have the IOs up above, like a lot of 4xx do. Cheers, Ben.