From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61EBDDF09 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:36:17 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: linux-next: ttydev tree build failure From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <20081023083406.671d4101@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20081023172938.0460b191.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081023083406.671d4101@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:35:54 +1100 Message-Id: <1224747354.7654.394.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Hendrik Brueckner , ppc-dev Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 08:34 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Patch is correct. > > Do the hvc patches have dependancies on the PPC tree as well as the > tty tree ? Note that I have a serie of 5 hvc patches in the ppc tree... Ben.