From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240FADDDEF for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 04:21:24 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9VHL1lU028882 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:21:01 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9VHLEBc058926 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:21:16 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9VHL1Qg019425 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:21:01 -0600 Subject: Re: [RFC] a little disassembly infrastructure From: Hollis Blanchard To: Paul Mackerras In-Reply-To: <18690.35483.845880.696901@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1224867546.9634.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> <18690.35483.845880.696901@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:20:56 -0500 Message-Id: <1225473656.14521.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , kvm-ppc List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 13:55 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Hollis Blanchard writes: > > > I've also found xmon's ppc-opc.c. That parses the opcode and operands, > > so could use some shared macros. > > That's a direct copy from GNU binutils. I'm reluctant to modify it > because then maintenance becomes more than just copying in the latest > version. OK, makes sense. Can I get an Acked-by on this patch, or should I move the code to a KVM-specific header? Either way I'll submit it via the KVM tree as usual. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center