From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Nicolas Palix <npalix@diku.dk>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] powerpc/powermac: Add missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:58:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228694298.21407.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081207164333.78b69d16.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1480 bytes --]
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 16:43 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:31:00 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm really in two minds about applying any of the of_node_put patches
> > that only affect powermacs. The reference counts only matter on
> > platforms where we update the OF device tree at runtime, which is
> > currently only IBM pSeries machines. Since we don't have any hotplug
> > on powermacs, and never will have, the OF device tree is completely
> > static and we don't actually need refcounts on the nodes at all, so
> > who cares if they're a bit higher than they might be?
> >
> > In particular, the VIA whose node we're looking for here is built-in
> > on the motherboard, and there can never be more than one, and it can
> > never be removed.
>
> I my mind it is about consistent use of the API and good examples for
> people to copy. Also, in about a year you will be presented with the
> same set of patches when a new pair of eyes looks at the same code and
> notices the discrepancy ...
what-he-said++
Allowing the ref counting to be broken in one part of the code is just
asking for it to be broken everywhere.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 13:45 [PATCH linux-next] powerpc/powermac: Add missing of_node_put Nicolas Palix
2008-12-02 23:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-02 23:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-03 10:25 ` [PATCH] " Nicolas Palix
2008-12-07 0:34 ` [PATCH linux-next] " Andrew Morton
2008-12-07 2:31 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-07 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-07 14:09 ` Nicolas Palix
2008-12-07 23:58 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228694298.21407.4.camel@localhost \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=npalix@diku.dk \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).