From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4212ADE547 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:46:45 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Enable RELOCATABLE option for CRASH_DUMP From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Milton Miller In-Reply-To: <0ba5eb018563b895658033d2db0c9b9f@bga.com> References: <0ba5eb018563b895658033d2db0c9b9f@bga.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:45:45 +1100 Message-Id: <1231296345.14860.49.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-ppc List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 07:28 -0600, Milton Miller wrote: > Mohan wrote: > > > config CRASH_DUMP > > bool "Build a kdump crash kernel" > > - depends on (PPC64 && RELOCATABLE) || 6xx > > + depends on PPC64 || 6xx > > + select RELOCATABLE > > help > > Build a kernel suitable for use as a kdump capture kernel. > > The same kernel binary can be used as production kernel and > > dump > > > > You should only select relocatable if ppc64 Please, can you try to conserve the mail IDs when you reply ? Not only you break threads, but your replies never make it to patchwork which makes it hard for me to know that you commented or acked/nacked a patch. Thanks ! Cheers, Ben.