From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6795474C3 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:36:35 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [BUG] hvc_console WARN() on current upstream From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <20090108111116.3f806d67@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <1231391897.2142.40.camel@pasglop> <200901080857.44090.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1231404121.2142.50.camel@pasglop> <20090108111116.3f806d67@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:36:12 +1100 Message-Id: <1231446972.2142.55.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Christian Borntraeger , Joe Peterson , Milton Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:11 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Seems that we are in interrupt, doing hvc_poll, which does > > > tty_flip_buffer_push > > Which means that someone has tty->low_latency set and is calling > tty_flip_buffer_push in an IRQ. That has never been allowed or safe, and > now it hurts ;) Heh, allright :-) I'll see where that flag is set and clear it when using IRQs. > That comment has been there for some years in varying formats Possibly, I didn't write that code, thanks for pointing me to the problem. Cheers, Ben.