From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andrew Klossner <andrew@cesa.opbu.xerox.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore PCI IO space behind Freescale pseudo-bridge
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:37:34 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231965454.22571.103.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901141948.n0EJmXH3002897@pogo.cesa.opbu.xerox.com>
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:48 -0800, Andrew Klossner wrote:
> When I moved from 2.6.27 to 2.6.28, one of my devices didn't work
> until I devised the attached patch. The kernel disallowed PCI I/O
> space resources behind the pseudo-bridge in the Freescale MPC8545
> because that bridge's config-space registers incorrectly report that
> it doesn't forward I/O space transactions.
>
> Checking for a specific vendor ID is hacky, but it got my system going
> again with only a few perturbed lines. Is there a more correct way to
> achieve this?
A few things yes.
First, can't you just set the PCI_COMMAND_IO bit from a quirk or at init
time rather than adding to code to cope with it being cleared later on ?
Also, the fact that it's detected as uninitialized shouldn't have broken
access to your device. If there is need for some IO space, for example
because a device requests some, the kernel should have re-opened that
window of the bridge.
Thus if that failed, it would be useful to track it down a bit more. You
can try enabling DEBUG in pci-common.c and pci-64.c, boot with "debug"
on the kernel command line and and send the resulting dmesg log
Ben.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index f36936d..f9f0048 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ static int __devinit pcibios_uninitialized_bridge_resource(struct pci_bus *bus,
> struct pci_dev *dev = bus->self;
> resource_size_t offset;
> u16 command;
> + u16 vendor;
> int i;
>
> /* We don't do anything if PCI_PROBE_ONLY is set */
> @@ -1030,7 +1031,16 @@ static int __devinit pcibios_uninitialized_bridge_resource(struct pci_bus *bus,
> * starting at low addresses -is- valid. What we do instead if that
> * we consider as unassigned anything that doesn't have IO enabled
> * in the PCI command register, and that's it.
> + * However, we don't do that if the bridge is internal to a Freescale
> + * CPU, as such bridges break the rules by, for example, not populating
> + * the PCI_COMMAND_IO bit.
> */
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &vendor);
> + if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_MOTOROLA ||
> + vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &command);
> if (command & PCI_COMMAND_IO)
> return 0;
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 19:48 [PATCH] Restore PCI IO space behind Freescale pseudo-bridge Andrew Klossner
2009-01-14 20:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
[not found] <200901271813.n0RIDBHq023872@pogo.cesa.opbu.xerox.com>
2009-01-28 5:37 ` Kumar Gala
2009-01-28 9:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-28 15:59 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1231965454.22571.103.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=andrew@cesa.opbu.xerox.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).