From: Michele Pallaro <michele.pallaro@alcatel-lucent.it>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Aaron Pace <kodiakuppercut@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Non-contiguous physical memory
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:52:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232733128.6271.19.camel@ITVIMNXI34497> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3725D962-7F25-4A77-8D87-9BBA0A78D406@kernel.crashing.org>
Hello,
I have a similar problem with my custom board CPU mpc8548 (E500V2) with
4Gbytes of RAM
0x0000_0000 -- 0x7FFF_FFFF 2Gbytes
0x1_0000_0000 -- 0x1_7FFF_FFFF 2Gbytes
I Enable the option PHYS_64BIT, and set in dts
memory {
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <1>;
device_type = "memory";
reg = <00000000 00000000 00000000 7FFFFFFF
00000001 00000000 00000000 7FFFFFFF>;
};
But the kernel can see just 2Gbytes of memory.
How the kernel can see the other 2Gbytes ?
Michele
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:28 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Aaron Pace wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm working on a design using a Freescale MPC8572 processor.
> > We are using 4 gigs of memory, and also need a window of 512 megs for
> > PCI-E devices.
> > What I have done is set up the first 2G of memory from 0x0 - 0x7f, the
> > PCI windows from 0x8 - 0x9f, localbus devices + CCSRBAR from 0xf -
> > 0xffffffff, and the second 2G of ram from 0x1.0000.0000 -
> > 0x1.8000.0000.
> > I've got this set up in U-boot (although it only uses the low mem),
> > but Linux will only use the first contiguous physical area (the
> > message is "Only using first contiguous memory region").
> > Is it possible to have multiple non-contiguous physical memory chunks
> > used for memory allocation?
> > If not, is there a better way to set this up without losing large
> > chunks of memory?
>
> Its possible in that Linux supports this. However the PPC32 code does
> not exist and would need to be added to support non-contiguous memory
> ranges.
>
> What exact PCI-E needs do you have? Is PCI-E performance critical?
> Is (are) your pci device(s) 64-bit address capable?
>
> I ask because depending on the answers doing straight 4G and PCI above
> that range might be sufficient for your needs.
>
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-23 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 15:18 Non-contiguous physical memory Aaron Pace
2009-01-21 17:28 ` Kumar Gala
2009-01-21 18:00 ` Aaron Pace
2009-01-21 23:25 ` Kumar Gala
2009-01-23 17:52 ` Michele Pallaro [this message]
2009-01-23 19:50 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1232733128.6271.19.camel@ITVIMNXI34497 \
--to=michele.pallaro@alcatel-lucent.it \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kodiakuppercut@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).