From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166CFDE006 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:31:24 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore PCI IO space behind Freescale pseudo-bridge From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: <200901271813.n0RIDBHq023872@pogo.cesa.opbu.xerox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:31:12 +1100 Message-Id: <1233135072.6963.34.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Andrew Klossner List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > We are using the patch I emailed. It's ugly in that it hard-codes the > > Freescale vendor ID, but it works for us. > > I guess I'm confused what the actual breakage is beyond some printk > messages. > > We "fixup" the resources in fsl_pcibios_fixup_bus() so Ben's change > shouldn't have an impact. Does something actually stop functioning? I think the problem comes from my patch that "detects" closed bridge windows, which uses the PCI_COMMAND register as a clue, and it seems that your bridges don't properly support IO enable in there.. Ben.